Why Developers Should Consider WordPress.com Hosting

What if you could forget about updates, security patches, latency glitches, and bandwidth/disk space issues? Automattic, the company behind WordPress, has provided a hosting service so comprehensive that it even allows installation of third-party plugins and templates.

A WordPress site on a laptop screen

WordPress (WP) is not only the most popular content management system, but as of August 2017 it powers 28.5% of all of the web (see “Usage Statistics and Market Share of Content Management Systems for Websites“). This is largely because site owners are running a copy of the free software provided at WordPress.org (WP.org) on their own servers.

Hosting your own copy of WP gives you the freedom add plugins, tweak templates and customize the behavior of the software, but it does have downsides such as dealing with lots of updates, security problems, and issues we’ll discuss in a moment.

WP also offers a hosted version of its software at WordPress.com. Developers have tended to avoid this option, mainly because it offers considerably less control over customization, no custom templates and no plugins. But at the same time there are advantages, such as automatic updates, much tighter security, and global distribution. And more recently, WP.com has addressed some of its limitations and started offering a lot more control over the ways in which you can customize the software — even letting you install add-ons.

In this article, we’ll look at what you can and can’t do with a WP.com site, and I’ll offer reasons to why you might reconsider WP.com over the self-hosting option.

WordPress.com: SaaS!

SaaS stands for Software as a Service. Essentially, the software itself — in this case, WordPress — is the service. And with the software also comes all of of the infrastructure that’s needed to run it, and you don’t need to worry about server resources and all of what’s needed to run and manage a WP installation.

WP.com is the official hosting supported by Automattic, the company that handed the WordPress trademark to the WordPress Foundation in 2010. Matt Mullenweg, the creator of WP, is the CEO and founder of Automattic, the company for all things WordPress. This is WP in the cloud.

What you get for using a service like WP.com is the peace of mind that things won’t get broken even of you leave them entirely unattended. But let’s see in detail how switching out from a shared hosting plan to WP.com can simplify things.

Updates and upgrades

When running your own, self-hosted copy of WP, you need to perform regular updates in order to keep your installation safe. The engineering team at WP made the process really smooth, so if you have set certain writing permissions right, this is something that shouldn’t take you more than a minute or two. Still, you’ll need to do that on a somewhat regular basis. A lot of sites get out of date quickly, providing a lot of scope for hackers to get busy.

Then you have the upgrades. Consider these scenarios:

  • an update going from, let’s say, version 4.8 to 4.8.1
  • an upgrade from 4.7 to 4.8
  • a mayor upgrade going from version 3.9 to 4.0.

The first, “update” type is normally smooth, with just security and performance issues are involved.

Upgrades can sometimes be problematic, since new features are introduced.

But major upgrades are almost guaranteed to be a pain, with templates and plugins needing to be rewritten in order to work properly with the upgraded API.

Since WP.com is run by the same folks who maintain the WP.org codebase, all of the updates and upgrades are smoothly synchronized from one to the next.

Load balancing and global distribution

Performance matters today more than ever. With developers under pressure to deliver sites fast, it’s not enough to throw a site on shared hosting and leave it at that. Issues like load balancing, and CDNs to deliver content globally immediately, have become a big consideration when setting up a site.

If your sites have an international audience, you’ll always have the visitors near to the data center accessing your site very fast, but the more you get away from it, the less responsive your sites will become (e.g: having a site hosted on the US West Cost, and accessing it from Europe.)

WP.com provides load balancing out of the box. No matter now big your site, no matter how much traffic it has, or globally distributed your audience is, WP.com can handle all of it, and more. And it also comes with the benefits of what a cloud hosting service is (see “A Comparison of Shared and Cloud Hosting, and How to Choose“), including being part of a network distributed across the globe, which makes your site nearly instantly available, no matter if accessed from Shanghai, Rome, Johannesburg, New York City, or Rio de Janeiro.

Server upgrades and maintenance

And the same goes with the software that WP relies to run — PHP and MySQL. Every once in a while, your hosting company will go through a mayor upgrade, with plenty of notification emails, documentation and tutorials on how to make the transition, setting the company’s forums on fire. Again, server upgrades don’t happen often, but when they do it’s a time consuming process that involves things various things up again, testing, and the risk of getting your sites broken if you failed to do transition properly.

If you have a couple of WP installations, the maintenance time will add up, and you’ll need to be very methodical to avoid problems in the mid and long run. And the more diverse your clientele, the more servers you’ll need to keep an eye on, and the less you’ll be able to simplify updates.

WP.com engineers maintain all of the infrastructure for you, and even mayor upgrades (both software and hardware) are handled smoothly. This is the magic of SaaS, where the software itself is the service, and you don’t need to worry about anything else other than just using it.

Because of the best DevOps practices, you won’t ever find out that such mayor changes happened to the infrastructure. And this won’t affect your site’s uptime, which will be 100% even during mayor software and hardware upgrades.


A problem of not performing updates in time is that you’ll end up with an insecure WP installation where any script kiddie can take control over your sites, by just scanning vulnerable WP versions on the web.

Also, even if your self-hosted WP instance is up to date, it only takes an unattended vulnerability on the server for a more skilled cracker to take over. And while this doesn’t happen all the time, it’s something many of us have painfully experienced.

Every patch is applied to WP.com as soon as it comes available to WP.org. Also, because of the globally distributed nature of the cloud, the impact of DDoS attacks is heavily minimized. And even in the event of a zero-day exploit being used on WP.com to compromise its websites, as soon as the attack is detected the engineers will immediately reverse the bogus changes and patch the security hole.

Already on a Dedicated Server or Managed Plan? Think Again!

A dedicated server is the power version of a shared hosting plan, or should I say, a “shared hosting plan” without the “shared” part.

Effectively, you’ll have more “dedicated” resources, such as bandwidth, CPU, RAM memory, disk space. But in essence, you’re still not solving any of the problems described above, so in this sense a dedicated server offers little added value.

And you’ll pay a lot for it! The long-term costs of having a dedicated server can be around a $1000/yr. And with just three dedicated servers running a couple of WP sites, you can very easily reach the $500/mo mark.

Turns out that a more cost-effective solution is available, that will not only assign you as much bandwidth, CPU, RAM and space as you can possibly need, but it will also solve all of the above mentioned issues at the same time.

Continue reading %Why Developers Should Consider WordPress.com Hosting%

Source: Sitepoint